Undue Influence: How the richest among us will elect Virginia’s next Governor

This afternoon the folks at the Virginia Public Access Project released their analysis of the campaign contributions raised during the first quarter of the Virginia’s race for governor. The numbers underscore how the richest among us have the most influence in our political system. They also show how powerful out of state donors are in control of the campaign of Terry McAuliffe, in contrast to the other three candidates: Bob McDonnell, Creigh Deeds and Brian Moran.

Here’s what the analysis shows:

All four candidates raised the bulk of their 1st quarter cash from people, corporations or organizations who gave more than $100. It’s also telling to look at the donations by zip code. I was particularly struck by where the candidates raised this money — VPAP’s zip code list makes that easy to discover. I define a “gold mine” zip code to be any zip code whose residents give $10,000 or more to a candidate. Keep in mind one $10,000 donation could make a zip code a “gold mine” in my book. So could 10 $1,000 gifts.

Looking closer:

Bob McDonnell received 1,561 contributions. His average contribution size was $1,421. McDonnell had 33 “gold mine” zip codes. All but 5 were in Virginia. This number is skewed by the fact that the Republican Governors Association donated $1.2 million to McDonnell. The RGA’s donations made to McDonnell were made by an arm of the RGA which is organized as a Section 527 organization, so the public has no idea who made these contributions. Presumably these donations are from corporate donors and out of state donors. (From people I know who have raised money for the RGA and its counterpart, the Democratic Governors Association, that’s where they typically raise their cash.) If you take out the RGA donation, McDonnell has 4 out of state “gold mine” zip codes and his revised average donation size was $653.

Creigh Deeds received 982 contributions. His average contribution size was $742. Deeds had 15 “gold mine” zip codes. All but 2 were in Virginia.

Brian Moran  received 1762 contributions. His average contribution was $458. Moran had 19 “gold mine” zip codes. All but 2 were in Virginia. Significantly, the overwhelming number of Moran’s donors gave $100 or less.

Terry McAuliffe received 2,556 contributions. His average contribution size was $1,649. McAuliffe had 78 “gold mine” zip codes.  Of these 78 zip codes, only 17 were in Virginia. Most surprising is how much of McAuliffe’s money came from out of state. According to his campaign, 82% of these donations were from outside of Virginia. (I don’t know if that’s in dollar terms or where the donors live.)

Here are the key take-aways:

  • The wealthiest among us are controlling this election. To raise this kind of cash candidates must spend the bulk of their time with wealthy donors. This is troubling. What are these donors expecting in return?
  • Terry McAuliffe is raising an enormous amount of money from wealthy people who don’t live in Virginia. I am deeply disturbed by this fact. To me it underscores that McAuliffe has no real history of community involvement in Virginia. He is much closer to donors outside of the state.  Indeed, McAuliffe has raised more than $600,000 from donors in Los Angeles, California alone! To put this in perspective, Moran raised $807,432 and Deeds raised $728,812 during the entire quarter from donors across the country.

As I have said elsewhere on this blog, I believe we should ban PAC and corporate donations. I believe we should limit donors to $100 gifts for the primary and $100 for the general. I also believe that candidates should receive free television air time and that they should be prohibited from self-funding their campaigns.

Until we reform the way we pay for campaigns, we will continue to have elected officials beholden to the wealthiest among us.

Virginia, we can do better than this.

Bookmark and Share


Filed under corruption, Virginia Governor's Campaign

2 responses to “Undue Influence: How the richest among us will elect Virginia’s next Governor

  1. Bill Kuster

    Terry has a lot of support from around the country because he has worked around the country for the Democratic Party. Nonetheless, he still had more contributions under $100 than the other candidates and raised more money in Virginia that the other candidates. He simply works harder.

    His money/support will be useful for two things:
    1. Defeating the Republican nominee this fall.
    2. Bringing companies and jobs to Virginia. That is a big part of what a Governor does and I think we will have the best one in the country once Terry is elected.

    • When McAuliffe takes more than $600.000 from California and less than $6,000 from Virginia Beach why should I believe he cares more about Virginia Beach?

      I’m sorry, but his average donation is more than what most Virginians pay in rent or a mortgage payment. His campaign is paid for by rich out of state donors. Period.

      Take that out of the equation and he would have a whole lot more credibility. There’s reason Democrats give him such high negative ratings in polls and I’m very concerned that if we make the mistake of nominating him that there will be many Democrats like me who will either stay home, write in a candidate, or vote for McDonnell.

      The same can’t be said about Creigh Deeds and Brian Moran. That’s because they both have a history of involvement in Virginia and a history of public service.

      Terry McAuliffe has a history as the Clinton’s bag man. That’s all.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s