My thanks and my questions for The State newspaper

The newspaper business is a dying one. We’ve seen the papers in Seattle and Denver shut down and thousands of journalists have been laid off this year as publishers struggle to retain subscribers and advertisers as the public moves to online sources for news.

In light of this, I think it’s impressive that The State newspaper, the largest in South Carolina, has led the country in breaking the news about Gov. Mark Sanford and his lies about his extramarital affair. The Columbia paper has beaten out national media and every other news outlet in the state in covering this story, reporting exclusive, after exclusive.

The paper had a reporter ambushing the governor as he was getting off a flight from Argentina in Atlanta. They also obtained emails between the governor and his mistress, which they published on their website this evening.

The paper and its staff deserves a thank you from the people of South Carolina and the people who potentially would have voted for Sanford were he to run for President in 2012.

But I am troubled that the paper had these emails in its possession since December and held back in publishing them until today. Since they knew the Governor was having an affair, why did they defend him in this editorial when we thought he was on the Appalachian Trail? Why did the reporter sent to ambush him at the Atlanta airport not confront him with the emails and the knowledge of the affair at the airport?

I get that they want to sell papers — the Governor will help them with that, no doubt — but were some standards of journalism broken here? It seems to me they should have confronted the Governor as soon as the emails came into their possession. They should have investigated his previous state-funded trips to Argentina and they should have reported before now that the Governor and his wife were separated for the last two weeks.

Maybe I am being too hard on them. What do you think?


1 Comment

Filed under corruption, Right wing nut jobs

One response to “My thanks and my questions for The State newspaper

  1. DanielK

    No, you aren’t being too hard on them! I was very curious that if they had those e-mails why they didn’t break the story sooner. Let’s say for instance that they didn’t know where this woman was from, any research into the issue would have turned up evidence. I believe that it was most beneficial to them to simply sit on the story until it eventually just fell onto their laps like it did.

    I mean they deserve credit for breaking the story but they simply pickup what was essentially rolled to them. If they had the e-mails they should have investigated and broken it sooner! Just my thoughts….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s